Editorial Policy
Last updated: January 2025
Mission
Free Speech Atlas aims to be the most accurate, balanced, and comprehensive reference on free speech law and policy on the internet. We serve readers who want to understand the law and the best arguments on all sides — not readers who want their existing views confirmed.
Independence
Our editorial decisions are made independently of funders, advertisers, and political organizations. We accept no paid content or sponsored articles. Where we have received support from foundations or donors, those relationships are disclosed.
Use of AI
We use large language models to assist with drafting, research, and structuring content. All AI-generated content is reviewed, edited, and verified by human editors before publication. We do not publish raw AI output. AI is a tool, not a substitute for editorial judgment.
Accuracy Standards
Case citations, holdings, and legal summaries are verified against primary sources. We distinguish clearly between settled doctrine, contested interpretation, and editorial opinion. We do not publish legal analysis as legal advice.
Balance and Perspective
Where free speech questions are genuinely contested, we present the strongest version of competing arguments. We favor robust speech protection as a general principle, but we apply that principle consistently across the political spectrum and engage seriously with arguments for regulation.
Corrections
We correct errors promptly and transparently. Significant factual corrections are noted in the article. To report an error, email info@aisuretech.com.